Japan – Trade Policy
Trade & Investment Policy :-
Since the twelfth meeting of the Trade Policy Review on
Japan in 2015, Japan has been committed to trade liberalization under the
multilateral trading system centered on the WTO. Japan is determined to be
fully engaged in this non-discriminatory, open and rule-based regime.
While committed to
the multilateral trade negotiations, Japan is also pursuing the conclusion of
Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs), both bilateral and regional, and
plurilateral trade agreements. The negotiations of EPAs and plurilateral
agreements will enhance the transparency of the respective member country's
economic policy and reinforce the competitiveness of its industries, which will
bring about positive impacts on the multilateral trade negotiations. Japan also
has in mind that we should assess the possibility of reflecting the outcomes of
the bilateral and plurilateral initiatives in the multilateral trading system.
Japan is currently a party to sixteen EPAs. Through the
"Japan Revitalization Strategy" issued by the Government in June
2013, Japan is committed to increasing the FTA coverage ratio to 70% by 2018
from the current figure of 39.5%. Regional trade agreements and multilateral
trading system under the WTO should complement one another and Japan believes
that these regional agreements will serve as building blocks to achieve higher
trade liberalization at the multilateral level.
plurilateral negotiations in relation to the WTO, Japan has actively
participated in plurilateral negotiations such as the Trade in Services
Agreement (TiSA) and the Environmental Goods Agreement (EGA). As for TiSA, the
leaders of the G7 declared at the G7 Ise-Shima Summit that they look forward to
concluding negotiations on an ambitious, balanced and mutually beneficial
agreement by the end of 2016. As for EGA, in the Leader's Communique of the G20
Hangzhou Summit 2016, the EGA members welcomed the landing zone achieved in the
WTO EGA negotiations, and reaffirmed their aim to redouble efforts to bridge
remaining gaps and conclude an ambitious, future-oriented EGA that seeks to
eliminate tariffs on a broad range of environmental goods by the end of 2016.
These negotiations will achieve significant progress towards multilateral trade
With the rise of protectionism around the world, Japan
welcomes the political commitments made at international fora such as G7, G20
and APEC on the standstill and rollback of protectionist measures. In this
context, Japan fully supports the WTO's peer review system of Trade Policy
Review and Trade Monitoring, which aim at curbing protectionist measures.
As holder of the G7 Presidency in 2016, Japan hosted the G7
Ise-Shima Summit and led the discussion on trade issues that took place there.
The G7 leaders reconfirmed the importance of free trade and their commitment to
fight against protectionism. They also confirmed their intent to strengthen the
multilateral trading system centred on the WTO and actively promote
plurilateral negotiations within the WTO specific areas.
Strengthening and maintaining the multilateral trading
system, which forms the basis of global trade, is a pillar of Japan's trade
policy. Since the last review, Japan has always fully engaged in bringing about
progress in the multilateral trading system under the WTO. While respecting the
principles of transparency and inclusiveness, Japan is setting out to offer new
ideas and approaches to advance the trade negotiations under the WTO. In the
lead up to the successful conclusion of the 10th Ministerial Conference (MC10)
in Nairobi in 2015, Japan has made significant contributions to narrowing the
gaps among member countries and reaching consensus. Considering the future WTO
negotiation function, including whether to continue DDA, was the biggest issue
at hand before the conference. However, no concrete decision has been made on
this issue due to confrontation among members. Japan assumes that each of the
eight areas covered by DDA, including development, remain important. However
Japan also believes that it is necessary to explore new approaches including
"up-to-date" issues, in order to revitalize and reinforce the WTO's
At MC10, over fifty members concluded the ITA expansion
negotiations led by Japan as the chair. Eliminating tariffs on 201 items valued
at over US$1.3 trillion per year by 53 members who account for approximately
90% of world trade in the products proposed for inclusion in the product
expansion is expected to bring benefits to all WTO members. The new accord
covers new generation semi-conductors, semi-conductor manufacturing equipment,
optical lenses, GPS navigation equipment, and medical equipment such as
magnetic resonance imaging products and ultra-sonic scanning apparatus. The
agreement also contains a commitment to tackle non-tariff barriers in the IT
sector, and to keep the list of products covered under review to determine
whether further expansion may be needed to reflect future technological
Japan's dedication to making new rules and practices through
the ongoing negotiations on TiSA and EGA will contribute to establishing a more
solid and conducive basis for enhancing business and trade on a worldwide
In April 2014, the revision of the Government Procurement
Agreement (GPA) came into force for Japan. With its revision, Japan has
expanded its coverage in terms of the threshold of the central governmental
entities, entities of sub-central level, as well as covered services.
Observing the compliance with the WTO rules through Dispute Settlement
is one of the most important and critical roles played by the WTO to maintain
an open and fair multilateral trading system. Japan has actively engaged in the
WTO dispute settlement mechanism to resolve disputes as both a party and a
third party to a dispute. Japan continues to seek improvements and
clarifications of the Dispute Settlement Understanding (DSU) which will serve
members' shared interests by enhancing compliance with trade rules and ensuring
the integrity and credibility of the rule-based trade system.
Development was one of the big components agreed among the
WTO members in the decisions taken at the Nairobi Ministerial Conference in
December 2015. Among those decisions, those that have relevance for development
include 1) Special Safeguard Mechanism for Developing Country Members, 2)
Public Stockholding for Food Security Purposes, 3) Export Competition, 4)
Cotton, 5) Preferential Rules of Origin for Least-Developed Countries and 6)
implementation of Preferential Treatment in Favour of Services and Service
Suppliers of Least Developed Countries and Increasing LDC Participation in
Services Trade. Through its active participation in the Conference, Japan has
played an important role in leading the outcome of these decisions and has been
meticulously monitoring whether those decisions are in effect and in action
even after the Conference.
Japan has been actively continuing its participation in the
discussions related to various items of the development agenda such as Aid for
Trade, recognizing that integrating developing and least-developed countries in
the multilateral trading system is one of the essential roles of the WTO. In
particular, Japan has actively supported LDC accessions through technical
assistance to accession applicants to build their trade capacity.
FTA / EPAs
Maintaining and strengthening the multilateral trading
system under the WTO has been a main pillar of Japan's external economic
policy. At the same time, Japan has also promoted its regional and bilateral trade
policies as a means of complementing the multilateral trading system,
particularly through Economic Partnership Agreements that include elements of
Free Trade Agreements and institution-building.
The data concerning the Economic Partnership Agreements is
summarized in Table below (as of December 2014).
of the Entry into Force
Entered into force :-
Singapore (The Agreement between Japan and Republic of Singapore for
a New Age Economic Partnership(JSEPA))
30 Nov 2002
- The sixth and seventh Supervisory Committees were held in January
and March 2016 respectively.
- The amended Agreement came
into effect in September 2007.
- The partial amendment of the Annex (IIA "Product-Specific
Rules" and IIB "Minimum Data Requirement for Certificate of
Origin") came into effect in January 2008.
Mexico (The Agreement between Japan and the United Mexican States for
the Strengthening of the Economic Partnership)
1 April 2005
- The Protocol between Japan and the United Mexican States related to
Improvement of Market Access Conditions based on paragraphs 3 and 5 of
Article 5 of the Agreement between Japan and the United Mexican States for
the Strengthening of the Economic Partnership entered into force in April
- The Protocol Amending the Agreement between Japan and the United
Mexican States for the Strengthening of the Economic Partnership was signed
in September 2011 and entered into force in April 2012.
- Sub-Committees on Trade in Goods, SPS Measures, Technical Regulations,
Standards and Conformity Assessment Procedures, Rules of Origin, Certificate
of Origin and Customs Procedures, Cross-Border Trade in Services, Entry and
Temporary Stay, Government Procurement, Cooperation in the Field of Trade and
Investment Promotion, Cooperation in the Field of Agriculture, Cooperation in
the Field of Tourism, and also the Special Sub-Committee on Steel Products
and the Committees for the Improvement of the Business Environment have been
held to date.
Malaysia (The Agreement between the Government of Japan and the
Government of Malaysia for an Economic Partnership)
13 July 2006
- The third Joint Committee was held in February 2013.
- Sub-Committees on Trade in Services, Improvement of Business
Environment, Cooperation, Rules of Origin, Intellectual Property, Sanitary
and Phytosanitary, Investment, Trade in Goods, and Technical Regulations,
Standards and Conformity Assessment Procedures have been held to date.
Chile (The Agreement between Japan and the Republic of Chile for a
Strategic Economic Partnership)
3 Sept 2007
- Meetings of the Commission, Committees on Trade in Goods and
Improvement of Business Environment and the Working Group on Fish and Fishery
Products have been held to date.
Thailand (The Agreement between Japan and the Kingdom of Thailand for
an Economic Partnership)
1 Nov 2007
- Sub-Committee on Trade in Goods was held in June 2015.
- Sub-Committee on Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries was held in
- Sub-committee on enhancement of business environment was held in
- Sub-Committees on Trade in Services, Rules of Origin, Small and
Medium Enterprises, Paperless Trading, Enhancement of Business Environment,
Customs Procedures, Tourism, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, Trade in
Goods, and Movement of Natural Persons have been held to date.
Indonesia (The Agreement between Japan and the Republic of Indonesia
for an Economic Partnership)
1 July 2008
- The fourth Joint Committee was held in December 2015.
- Sub-Committees on Rules of Origin, Trade in Goods, Trade in
Services, Movement of Natural Persons, Cooperation, and Investment have been
held to date.
Brunei Darussalam (The Agreement between Japan and Brunei Darussalam
for an Economic Partnership)
31 July 2008
Sub-Committees on Trade in Services and Cooperation have been held to
ASEAN (The Agreement on Comprehensive Economic Partnership among
Japan and Member States of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations)
1 December 2008 (Japan, Lao People's
Democratic Republic, Myanmar, Singapore, Viet Nam)
1 Jan 2009 (Brunei Darussalam)
1 Feb 2009 (Malaysia) 1 June 2009
(Thailand) 1 Dec 2009(Cambodia) 1 July 2010 (The Philippines)
The 15th Joint Committee was held in June 2016.
- Sub-Committees on Rules of Origin, Trade in Services, Investment
and Economic Cooperation and Standards, Technical Regulations and Conformity
Assessment Procedures have been held to date.
- The Agreement is a legally
independent agreement in relation to the bilateral EPAs between Japan and
individual ASEAN Member States and thus the entry into force of the Agreement
does neither nullify nor integrate those bilateral EPAs
The Philippines (The Agreement between Japan and the Republic of the
11 Dec 2008
The fifth Joint Committee was held in May 2016.
- Sub-Committees on Trade in Goods, Trade in Services, Rules of
Origin, Investment, Movement of Natural Persons, Improvement of Business
Environment, Mutual Recognition and Cooperation have been held to date.
Switzerland (The Agreement on Free Trade and Economic Partnership
between Japan and the Swiss Confederation)
1 Sept 2009
- The third Joint Committee was held in October 2016.
- Sub-Committee on Rules of Origin, Customs Procedures and Trade
Facilitation has been held after December 2014 to date.
Viet Nam (The Agreement between Japan and the Socialist Republic of
Viet Nam for an Economic Partnership)
1 October 2009
Sub-Committees on Movement of Natural Persons have been held to date.
India (Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement between Japan and
the Republic of India)
1 Aug 2011
-The third Joint Committee was held in July 2016.
- The sub-committee on Rules of Origin, Customs Procedures, TBT/SPS,
Trade Services, and Improvement of Business Environment has been held to
Peru (The Agreement between Japan and the Republic of Peru for an
1 March 2012
-Meeting of the Commission and the Sub-Committee on Improvement of
the Business Environment have been held to date
Australia (The Agreement between Japan and Australia for an Economic
15 January 2015
-The first meeting of the Joint Committee was held in Tokyo on 15
- Sub-Committee on Promotion of a Closer Economic Relationship was
held in Tokyo on 8 October 2015.
Mongolia (The Agreement between Japan and Mongolia for an Economic
7 June 2016
TPP (Trans-Pacific Partnership)
Signed on 4 Feb 2016. (Japan
participated in TPP negotiations in July 2013)
-Ministerial Meeting was held in Atlanta and an agreement in principle
was reached on 5 October 2015.
- Japan submitted the agreement to the Diet for approval on 8 March
The Republic of Korea
Negotiation suspended (The
negotiations commenced in December 2003)
- Six rounds of negotiations were held.
- Although no negotiations have been held since the end of the sixth
round held in November 2004, four rounds of the working-level consultation
were held by December 2009 to consider the resumption of negotiations.
Director-general level consultations for the EPA were held in September 2010
and in May 2011. Several rounds of working-level consultations have been held
GCC (Gulf Cooperation Council)
Negotiation postponed (Formal
negotiations commenced in September 2006)
- Two rounds of negotiations and four rounds of informal intermediate
meetings were held. The latest meeting was held in March 2009.
Under negotiation (The negotiations
commenced in November 2012)
- Seven rounds of negotiations were held. The latest meeting was held
in Tokyo in November 2014.
Under negotiation (The negotiations
commenced in December 2012)
Thirteen rounds of negotiations were held. The latest meeting was
held in Tokyo in September 2015
CJK (China, Japan and Republic of Korea)
Under negotiation (The negotiations
commenced in March 2013)
- Ten rounds of negotiations were held. The latest meeting was held
in Seoul in June 2016
RCEP (Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership)
Under negotiation (The negotiations
commenced in May 2013)
- Fifteen rounds of negotiations were held. The latest meeting was
held in China in October 2016.
EU (European Union)
Under negotiation (The negotiations
commenced in April 2013)
- Seventeen rounds of negotiations were held. The latest meeting was
held in Brussels in September 2016.
Under negotiation (The negotiations
commenced in December 2014)
-Five rounds of negotiations were held. The latest meeting was held
in June 2016
· Other Regional/Bilateral Arrangements
Economic Cooperation (APEC)
Japan remains committed to APEC's mission of regional
economic integration and to the Bogor Goals of free and open trade and
investment. In 2010, APEC Leaders set forth the Yokohama Vision, which is a
comprehensive, forward-looking framework for achieving growth and prosperity in
the Asia-Pacific region in the 21st Century. Japan has continued and will
continue to take a leading role in realizing this vision in close cooperation
with other member economies.
At the APEC Economic Leaders' Meeting in Beijing in 2014,
APEC economic leaders extended their standstill commitment through the end of
2018 to refrain from introducing new protectionist measures, and reaffirmed
commitment (i) to rollback protectionist and trade-distorting measures and (ii)
to continue maximum restraint in implementing WTO-consistent measures with a
significant protectionist effect.
APEC's core mission continues to be further regional
economic integration and expansion of trade in the Asia-Pacific region. Against
rising skepticism over trade and stagnated trade growth, the Leaders and the
Ministers of APEC reiterate the commitment to build an open economy in the Asia
and Pacific at the Annual Economic Leaders' Meeting and the Annual Ministerial
Meeting respectively and APEC has pursued these objectives in 2016 by advancing
regional connectivity and addressing next-generation trade and investment
issues, including through the Free Trade Area of the Asia Pacific (FTAAP). It
also finalized the Collective Strategic Study on Issues Related to the
Realization of the FTAAP and adopted the APEC Services Competitiveness Roadmap
(ASCR), both of which contribute to further promote free and open trade and
investment and accelerate regional economic integration. In this regard, Japan
took the lead in the Study on Infrastructure Investment in the APEC Region and
Exploration on Strengthening of Maritime Connectivity. Japan also took the
initiative to implement the Study on Improving the Investment Climate for GVCs
Development, the Study on Enhancement of Integration of Regional Value Chains
in Asia and Latin America and Caribbean and Enhance resiliency of GVCs.
Asia-Europe Meeting (ASEM)
Japan believes that the economic dialogue and cooperation
between Asia and Europe through ASEM will promote enhanced mutual understanding
between the two regions on various economic issues, which could lead to
increased trade and investment between Asia and Europe, as well as to the
improved coordination of world economic issues of mutual concern relating to
the WTO, RTA/FTA, IPR, etc., thereby contributing to the development of the
Following the decision taken at the tenth ASEM Customs
Directors General-Commissioners Meeting in Goa, India in October 2015, Japan,
together with the European side's coordinator, Slovakia, has taken the
initiative to compile the situations and progress made in the field of the
Authorized Economic Operator (AEO) programmes in the ASEM members. In addition,
Japan is taking a leading role as the Asian side's Coordinator on the subject
of Passenger Name Record (PNR) in the ASEM Customs work for 2016-17. The tenth
ASEM Working Group Meeting on Customs Matters in Bandar Seri Begawan, Brunei
Darussalam in April 2016 endorsed the action plan on this subject.
Japan's Bilateral Activities outside
The United States
Japan and the United States conducted negotiations on
non-tariff measures (NTMs) and on motor vehicle trade in parallel to the
Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) negotiations. The negotiation on NTMs included
the areas of Insurance, Transparency/Trade Facilitation, Investment,
Intellectual Property Rights (IPR), Standards, Government Procurement,
Competition Policy, Express Delivery and SPS. The negotiation on motor vehicle
trade included Special Motor Vehicle Safeguard, Transparency, Standards,
Preferential Handling Procedure (PHP) Certification System, Green/New
Technology Vehicles, Financial Incentives, Distribution, Third Country
Cooperation and Other Issues. In February 2016, the Government of Japan signed
the TPP Agreement along with representatives from the other 11 participating
countries, while the Ambassador of Japan to the United States of America
Kenichiro Sasae and the United States Trade Representative Michael Froman also
signed letters to confirm the outcomes of the parallel negotiations.
Japan and the United States held the Seventh Director
General-Level Meeting of the U.S.-Japan Policy Cooperation Dialogue on the
Internet Economy in Tokyo in February 2016. This dialogue included a session
with representatives from the private sector. Participants had candid and
vibrant discussions on important topics on the Internet and Information and
Communication Technologies (ICT) such as the Internet of Things (IoT) and Smart
Cities, International Coordination and the Free Flow of Information, Addressing
Global Challenges through ICT, Use of Personal Data and Protection of Privacy,
Cybersecurity, and 5G (Fifth Generation Mobile Communications System). Such
policy-level dialogues are aimed at deepening bilateral policy coordination and
laying the groundwork for greater Japan-U.S. cooperation in the international
The trade turnover between Japan and the EU has steadily
recovered in recent years from the temporary decline in 2009 due to the world
economic crisis. As the Ministry of Finance reports, the volume of mutual trade
amounted to about ¥17 trillion in 2015. Japan is the EU's seventh largest
trading partner and the EU is Japan's third largest one. Regarding foreign direct
investment in each other's economies, Japan invested about ¥35 trillion and the
EU invested about ¥10 trillion in 2015. The EU is the largest investor and the
second largest investee for Japan. According to a survey by the Ministry of
Economy, Trade and Industry (METI), about 2,500 Japanese enterprises are
operating businesses in the EU and creating about half a million jobs.
On the occasion of the 23rd Japan-EU Summit Meetings on 29
May 2015, the leaders recognized the active and continued contribution of the
EU-Japan Business Round Table (BRT) to further development of the bilateral
economic relationship, and welcomed the recommendations BRT adopted in April
The trade and economic relationship between Japan and Russia
has been growing steadily in recent years. The trade turnover between the two
countries reached a record high level of US$34.8 billion in 2013.
Automobile-related products occupy more than 60% of Japanese exports to Russia
and three-quarters of Japanese imports from Russia are oil, gas and other
mineral-related materials. The total trade volume between Japan and Russia in
2015 amounted to US$20.9 billion, declining about 40% from the previous year.
Under the situation that the overall trade with Russia has decreased, the main
reasons for the decline is the decrease of automobile exports from Japan and
the prolonged downfall of prices of natural resources, which are the main
imported items from Russia.
In the course of the Japan-Russia summit meeting held in May
2016, the Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe presented an eight-point
cooperation plan to Russian President Vladimir Putin, aiming at the development
of Japan-Russia economic relations. Both leaders agreed to materialize the
plan. The points of the plan are (1) Extending healthy life expectancies; (2)
Developing comfortable and clean cities that are easy to reside and live in;
(3) Fundamental expansion of medium-sized and small companies' exchange and
cooperation; (4) Energy; (5) Promoting industrial diversification and enhancing
productivity in Russia; (6) Developing industries and export bases in the Far
East; (7) Cooperation on cutting-edge technologies; and (8) Fundamental
expansion of people-to-people interaction. In addition to Russia's economic
slowdown, sanctions by G7 countries towards Russia have had a negative impact
on Japan-Russia business and economic relations. Statistics show a rapid
decline in exports from Japan to Russia over the period from March to September
2014 compared to the same period of the previous year.
The economic interdependence between Japan and China is
growing deeper. China has been Japan's largest trading partner since 2007. The
mutual trade amount in 2015 reached US$270 billion. According to China's
statistical data, Japan was China's second largest trading partner in 2015 and
regarding foreign direct investment in China, Japan invested US$3.2 billion in
2015. According to Japan's data, 33,390 Japanese enterprises and their branches
were conducting business in China as of October 2015. Japan has bilateral
economic agreements and arrangements with China in the areas of trade, air
transportation, maritime transportation, trademark protection, tax, investment,
fisheries and mutual customs cooperation.
In 2007, for strategic economic dialogue at the ministerial
level, Japan and China decided to establish the Japan-China High-Level Economic
Dialogue. The first meeting was held in Beijing in December 2007, the second
meeting was held in Tokyo in June 2009 and the third meeting was held in
Beijing in August 2010. At these meetings both sides expressed views to
strengthen exchanges and cooperation in the fields of trade, investment, and
protection of intellectual property rights, among other areas. In addition, to
promote further bilateral cooperation in the economic field, various dialogues
between Japan and China have been held.
Republic of Korea
Japan and the Republic of Korea maintain a mutually
dependent economic relationship and it is growing steadily. The mutual trade
amount in 2015 reached US$71.5 billion. Japan and the Republic of Korea were
each other's third largest trading partners after China and the US in 2015.
Regarding foreign direct investment in the Republic of Korea, Japan was the
fourth largest investor with US$1,665 million in 2015. Foreign direct
investment from the Republic of Korea to Japan amounted to US$1,716 million in
In order to strengthen the economic relationship between
Japan and the Republic of Korea, the 14th Japan-Republic of Korea High-Level
Economic Consultation was held on 12 January 2015. Both sides exchanged views
to promote bilateral trade and investment, and reaffirmed the importance of
cooperation on global issues such as energy security and the environment. In
addition, both sides confirmed the recent development of cooperation between
Japanese and Korean enterprises in third countries on projects of resource
development and infrastructure, and exchanged views to promote further
bilateral cooperation in various economic fields.
Based on the "Japan-India Special Strategic and Global
Partnership", established by Prime Minister Abe and Prime Minister Modi in
2014, economic activities between two countries have been steadily enhanced.
The mutual trade amount in 2015 reached US$14.5 billion. This figure is twice
the amount reached in 2005.
To further strengthen the bilateral economic partnership,
Japan and India have been engaged in wide-ranging dialogues on trade,
investment promotion, and improvement of the business environment. The Eighth Japan-India
Strategic Dialogue on Economic Issues was held in July 2016 in Tokyo.
On 27 and 28 August 2016, the Sixth Tokyo International
Conference on African Development (TICAD VI) was held in Nairobi, the Republic
of Kenya. On that occasion, Japan announced that for a period of three years
from 2016 to 2018, it will invest for the future of Africa through implementing
measures centering on developing quality infrastructure, promoting resilient
health systems, and laying the foundations for peace and stability, amounting
to approx. US$30 billion under public-private partnership. These measures
include human resource development to 10 million people
("Empowerment") by making use of the strength of Japan
("Quality"). These measures are the very first step for Japan to
translate the outcomes of the G7 Ise-Shima Summit (quality infrastructure,
health, and women) into actions.
In May 2016, the Third Dialogue to Strengthen the Economic
Relationship between Mercosur and Japan was held in Montevideo, Uruguay. In
this Dialogue, both sides exchanged information on the current situations of
trade and investment between Japan and Mercosur. They also exchanged their
opinions over measures taken by both sides to promote free trade, and over
possible measures to encourage more investment between the two parties.
· Investment Policy :-
In the Japan Revitalization Strategy 2016 (decided by the
Cabinet in June 2016), the Japanese Government stated that it "will also
aim to increase the amount of inward FDI to ¥35 trillion by 2020 (¥24.4
trillion at the end of 2015)".
In March 2015, under the leadership of the Prime Minister,
the Council for Promotion of Foreign Direct Investment in Japan adopted the
"Five Promises for Attracting Foreign Businesses to Japan" as
important items to be addressed going forward. In addition, in May 2016, this
council adopted the "Policy Package for Promoting Foreign Direct
Investment into Japan to Make Japan a Global Hub" to promote more FDI to
make Japan an international trade and investment hub.
Currently, in accordance with the "Five Promises for
Attracting Foreign Businesses to Japan" and the "Policy Package for
Promoting Foreign Direct Investment into Japan to Make Japan a Global
Hub", through a steady driving growth strategy including discussion and
drawing conclusions so as to simplify regulations and administrative procedures
relevant to foreign companies, the Government of Japan will actively improve
Japan's business and living environment, and actively attract foreign
Investment Agreements :-
Japan has actively promoted the conclusion of investment
agreements as they create stable, equitable, favourable and transparent
conditions for greater investment through the removal of barriers to investment
and provision of investor protections. In the Japan Revitalization Strategy
(decided by the Cabinet in June 2016), the Japanese Government set the goal of
signing and/or achieving entry into force of investment-related agreements
(investment agreements and economic partnership agreements with investment
chapters) covering 100 countries/regions by 2020. As of September 2016, Japan
has concluded bilateral investment agreements, and a trilateral investment
agreement, with 35 countries and regions as well as EPAs that contain
investment chapters with 12 countries.
· Trade & Development
Aid for Trade
In order for developing countries including LDCs to reap
further benefit from the multilateral trading system, trade liberalization
alone is not sufficient. Enhancing capacities on the supply side and
encouraging assistance for this purpose is indispensable. Since Aid for Trade
(AfT) initiatives contribute to enhancing the trade capacities of developing
countries, Japan continues to provide various measures for AfT to this end, in
addition to promoting the "One Village, One Product" movement.
Japan's Development Initiatives for Trade
Japan announced the "Development Initiative for
Trade", prior to the WTO Ministerial Conference in Hong Kong, China in
December 2005. This initiative featured: (a) implementation of Duty-Free and
Quota Free Market Access for essentially all products originating from LDCs,
(b) provision of US$10 billion of financial assistance including trade,
production, and distribution infrastructure for three years (2006-08), and (c)
as part of (b), the exchange of a total of 10,000 trainees and experts in
trade-related fields over the same period, the targets of which were fully
achieved. During the designated period (2006-08) of the initiative, the total sum
of financial assistance amounted to US$17.66 billion, greatly exceeding the
target at 177%.
Given the successful results of the above-mentioned first
initiative, Japan announced a new AfT strategy, "Development Initiative
for Trade 2009" in July 2009. Its main pillar was US$12 billion of
financial assistance for trade-related projects including trade, production and
distribution infrastructure for 3 years from 2009 to 2011. During the
designated period (2009-11) of this initiative, the total sum of financial
assistance amounted to US$23.36 billion, which reached 195% of the target, well
surpassing the amount of the first initiative. Despite the fact that no
additional development initiative has been launched since then, Japan has
continuously expanded its assistance to a total of US$31.65 billion for the 3
years from 2013 to 2015. This is representative of Japan's strong commitment to
AfT, which Japan considers as important to help beneficiary countries meet the
new challenges they face in the regional and global economy.
Aid for Trade Asia-Pacific Regional Technical Group
Japan is executing not only a quantitative commitment but
also a qualitative commitment under the Initiative 2009, which aims for
improvement in efficiency of AfT. For instance, Japan has been fully involved
in the AfT Asia-Pacific RTG (Regional Technical Group) since its inception in
March 2009. The purpose of the RTG is to discuss the successful and rich
experiences of aid activities in the Asia-Pacific region, to find out some
elements of effective aid and share them with other regions, particularly
Africa. Japan hosted the Sixth RTG meeting in Tokyo in March 2013 to complete a
second report titled "Aid for Trade in Asia and the Pacific: Driving
Private Sector Participation in Global Value Chains", which highlights the
link between mainly the Japanese private sector participation in trade capacity
building and the ability of firms to plug into value chains and was submitted
to the Fourth Global Review in July 2013.
Tokyo International Conference on African Development
The Sixth Tokyo International Conference on African
Development (TICAD VI) was held in Nairobi, the Republic of Kenya, on 27 and 28
August 2016. Commitments announced by Japan with regard to trade and
development are as follows. 1.
JETRO will strengthen the partnership with African investment agencies and set
up a "Japan Desk" in the investment promotion agencies of 9 African
Japan will launch the "Japan-Africa Public-Private Economic Forum" in
order to support private-sector companies in establishing businesses in
3. Japan will aim by 2020 to have agreements related to investment
signed or entered into force with 100 countries and regions, and will
intensively work towards concluding them with African countries. Japan will
also aim to conclude tax treaties to further accelerate economic interaction
and investment between Japan and African countries.
Assistance to the One Village, One Product Movement
The One Village, One Product (OVOP) is one of the typical
approaches under AfT initiatives. OVOP is a movement that supports local
economies through the development, improvement and promotion of local products
(foods, beverages, textiles & garments, etc.) with the participation of
local people. This movement was first initiated in a southern prefecture in
Japan in the late 1970s and later spread to the other prefectures. It has been
introduced in other Asian countries and has contributed to the development of
Japan continues supporting this movement, especially the
exports of developing countries and least developed countries through technical
cooperation such as the dispatch of experts, educational and training programs
to create competitive products, and support through international
organizations. In addition, Japan has held exhibitions and trade fairs inviting
buyers and has also opened shops (OVOP markets) since 2006 in some of Japan's
international airports in order to introduce products and encourage consumers
to buy them.
Generalized System of Preferences (GSP)
In order to improve market access for developing countries,
Japan introduced a preferential tariff treatment under the GSP scheme on 1
August 1971, and has re-examined it several times since then. Furthermore,
under the scheme, Japan has granted special preferential treatment to LDCs
since 1980, including additional products for which preferences are granted
only to LDCs. Currently, 137 developing countries and 6 territories, including
all LDCs, enjoy the benefits of the GSP scheme. This scheme has been vastly
improved over the last several years, especially in 2007 and 2011. In the comprehensive
"Development Initiative for Trade" launched on 9 December 2005, Japan
announced its commitment to providing duty-free and quota-free (DFQF) market
access for essentially all products originating from LDCs. Japan is fully
committed to implementing the above initiative thus complying with the decision
adopted in the Hong Kong, China Ministerial Declaration. In realization to the
above-mentioned commitment, on 1 April 2007 Japan started improved DFQF
treatment for LDCs by adding a variety of items to the treatment. As a result,
the number of agricultural and fishery products originating from LDCs that
receive DFQF preferential treatment increased from 497 to 1,523 and that of
industrial products increased from 4,185 to 4,244. Consequently, coverage of
DFQF treatment for LDCs, which was previously approximately 86%, has risen to
approximately 98% as defined at the tariff line level. On 1 April 2011, Japan
extended the effective period of the GSP scheme to 31 March 2021, abolished all
ceiling-based schemes for certain industrial products, and revised the criteria
for application of competitiveness-focused, product-by-exclusion measures. The
revision was made to make the criteria more objective and transparent and to
allow less competitive developing countries to benefit more from the GSP
· JAPAN'S DOMESTIC POLICIES :-
The "three arrows" of Abenomics (aggressive
monetary policy, flexible fiscal policy, growth strategy that promotes private
investment) have shifted market expectation, ensured that Japan's economy is no
longer a deflationary one, boosted corporate profits, and expanded national
employment and income. In order to consolidate the current positive cycle into
"a Virtuous Cycle of Growth and Distribution", we have created a set
of ambitious targets. These targets are namely "a nominal GDP of ¥600
trillion (the largest in post-war history)", "the desirable birth
rate of 1.8", and "zero cases of persons forced to leave their jobs
for nursing care". Furthermore, three new arrows is now being released
towards these three targets. Through these efforts, we will build a society in
which all citizens participate, including women and men, older persons and the
young, people who have experienced failure, people with disabilities, and people
fighting illness, and we will enable them to play active roles in their
respective homes, workplaces, and local communities or any other places.
Details of the three new arrows are as follows:
First arrow: We will achieve a 600
trillion economy by utilizing the full range of policies. Through improvement
in productivity and ensuring of labour allowed by innovation and working-style
reform, we will enhance the supply side, make a virtuous circle of an economy
that continues to stimulate potential demands, which will lead to expansion of
Second arrow: We
will enable more youths to make their hopes of marriage and childbirth come
true. This is what the goal of "the desirable birth-rate of 1.8"
means. Towards a society where people can have and raise children with a sense
of security, we will ensure childcare arrangements are put in place and promote
comprehensive measures including improvement in working conditions of childcare
providers. We will also improve the educational environment so that all
children can receive desirable education.
Currently, the annual number of people leaving their jobs to provide their
family members with nursing care exceeds 100,000. Under the clear goal of
"no one forced to leave their jobs for nursing care", which means
people can keep on working while providing nursing care at the same time, we
will ensure nursing care arrangements are put in place and promote
comprehensive measures, including improvement in working conditions of nursing
care providers. We will also promote employment of older persons.
Intellectual Property Rights
On 7 June 2013, the Intellectual Property Strategy
Headquarters1 formulated the Intellectual Property Policy Vision (hereinafter
referred to as the "Vision"). On the same day, the Cabinet adopted
the essence of the Vision as the Basic Policy Concerning Intellectual Property
Policy, and its measures were partially reflected in the Japan Revitalization
Strategy, which is one of the "three arrows" of the current administration's
economic policy. Therefore, intellectual property policy is regarded as one of
the most important efforts for enhancing Japan's industrial competitiveness.
Based on the Basic Policy Concerning Intellectual Property
Policy, the efforts of the past 10 years has been reviewed and was set the
following three goals.
intellectual property system that attracts users and innovation investment from
Make Japan's intellectual property system become
a standard in emerging nations in Asia
Continuously produce human resources with
creativity and trategic capability for global intellectual property activities.
Towards these goals, the following four pillars of the
Vision, including policy challenges and efforts in the field of intellectual
property were organized, looking at medium- and long-term goals as
approximately ten years into the future.
Building up a global intellectual property
system for enhancing industrial competitiveness
Supporting the enhancement of intellectual
property management by SMEs and venture companies
Improving the environment for adjusting to a
digital network society
Strengthening soft power focusing on the content
The Intellectual Property Strategic Program is reviewed
annually as a short-term action plan that operationalizes the Basic Policy and
On 9 May 2016 the Intellectual Property Strategy
Headquarters decided on the Intellectual Property Strategic Program 2016. In
this Program, 145 concrete actions were formulated under the following four
Promotion of Intellectual Property Innovation
for the 4th Industrial Revolution
Spread/Penetration of Intellectual Property
Promotion of the Content Industry into New Areas
Development of Intellectual Property System
· Financial Reforms
The Financial Services Agency enacted "the Bill to
Partially Amend the Banking Act, etc., to Respond to the Environmental Changes
such as Advances in Information Technology", which established a legal framework
to respond to the environmental changes surrounding financial groups, including
rapid progress of integration between finance and information technology. The
details are as follows.
Enhancement of business management: Given
that each financial group has its own "management style", the amended
Act clarified the "functions" that financial groups should perform to
make business management of each financial group fully effective.
Strengthening financial intermediation by
consolidating common/duplicate operations: In order to achieve effective
business operation and strengthen financial intermediation, the amended Act
facilitated consolidation of common/duplicate operations in financial groups.
Response to rapid progress IT innovation:
The amended Act enabled financial groups to conduct business activities
flexibly, incorporating IT innovation in a strategic manner, facilitated
provision of payment-related services responsive to IT progress, and ensured
on Virtual Currencies (VC): Following the agreement on VC at the G7 summit,
the amended Act introduced measures on anti-money laundering and
counter-terrorist financing (AML/CFT) as well as user protection.
The Financial Services Agency recognized it was necessary to
appropriately prevent harm to investors to ensure reliability for the funds and
the smooth supply of funds for growth, and revised the Financial Instruments
and Exchange Act (enacted on 27 May 2015). The following steps have been taken
for "funds for professionals".
Notified requirements, etc.: introduction
of reasons for disqualification, expansion and publication of notification
Expansion of regulations on activities:
principle of suitability (prohibition of inappropriate solicitations in light
of the customers' knowledge, experience, etc.), accountability (duty to
explain) with regard to risk, etc.
Administrative responses to problem
operators, etc.: issuing orders to improve, suspend, abolish the business;
strengthening of penal provisions, etc.
In addition, the scope of investors is limited to persons
closely related to investors and fund operators with a certain level of ability
to make investment decisions.
With regard to venture funds that have in place a
corresponding system, including ensuring governance and implementation of
accounting audits by certified public accountants, investment is possible by
persons with practical experience, such as officers of listed companies and
persons who have launched a new business.
The Act on the Partial Revision of the Insurance Business
Act etc. was promulgated on 30 May 2014. The Act was enforced on 29 May 2016
with related provisions consolidated as below to enforce items that were
scheduled to become effective within 2 years.
The revision of the Ordinance for Enforcement of the
Insurance Business Act and the Comprehensive Guidelines for Supervision of
Insurance Companies includes the following elements.
Related internal rules should be put in place in
accordance with introduction of obligation to supply information to customers:
• points, such as product information, that are necessary for customers to
judge whether or not they should subscribe to an insurance contract, should be
prescribed in internal rules as points that have to be explained to customers
in insurance solicitation; and • in addition to the above, in regard to
comparing insurance products of a number of insurance firms and recommending
specific ones as part of the sales process, it should be prescribed that
information concerning the "general description of products subject to
comparison" and the "reason they compare and recommend specific
products" should be supplied to customers.
Related internal rules should be put in place in
accordance with introduction of obligation to ascertain customer's intention: •
an example of the concrete process of ascertainment of customer's intention
should be illustrated in order to seek an insurance solicitor to ascertain the
customer's intention according to insurance products and the solicitation situation.
Related internal rules should be put in place in
accordance with the introduction of obligation of an insurance solicitor to
consolidate the system: • in addition to education, management, and guidance by
insurance firms, a relevant system should be prescribed in order for the
insurance solicitor itself to properly carry out its business.
Others: • "purpose of insurance
solicitation" and "solicitation related operations" should be
clarified in internal rules; and • points of supervision concerning insurance
solicitation by telephone should be prescribed in internal rules.
Agricultural Reform :-
In order to address challenges such as aging society and
declining population, in March 2015 the government revised "the Basic Plan
for Food, Agriculture and Rural Areas", which consists of industrial
policy and regional policy.
Furthermore, the government established "the Plan for
Empowering Export on Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries" in May 2016, in
order to promote Japanese agricultural, forestry and fishery products, and food
in the global market.
In addition, the government is committed to implement
further reform with a view to enhancing the competitiveness of agriculture.
Besides system reform, the government is taking various
measures for enhancing productivity, for example, an automatic tractor driving
system can be commercially available under manned monitoring by 2018 and can be
utilized through remote monitoring by 2020.
On 7 December 2013, the Antimonopoly Act (AMA) Amendment Bill
was approved in the 185th extraordinary session of the Diet, and the enacted
act was promulgated on 13 December 2013. It contains the abolition of the
JFTC's hearing procedure and necessary revisions to develop procedures for
hearings prior to the Japan Fair Trade Commission (JFTC) issue of
administrative orders such as cease and desist orders. The enacted act shall
come into force from the date specified by Cabinet Order within a period not
exceeding one year and six months from the day of promulgation.
The Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement, signed by 12
countries including Japan, on 4 February 2016, includes an article which
prescribes that "Each Party shall authorise its national competition
authorities to resolve alleged violations voluntarily by consent of the
authority and the person subject to the enforcement action". On 8 March
2016, a bill for relevant law amendments associated with conclusion of the
Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement was submitted to the 190th ordinary Diet
session and carried over to the 192nd extraordinary Diet session. The bill
includes an amendment of the AMA to introduce a commitment procedure to
implement the article. The procedure's outline is as follows. 1) The JFTC
notifies an enterprise of suspicion of violating AMA; 2) The enterprise can
voluntarily submit a plan concerning measures necessary to cease and desist the
relevant conduct to the JFTC; 3) When the JFTC certifies that the plan
submitted is enough and the enterprise carries out the plan, the JFTC shall not
issue a cease and desist order or a surcharge payment order.
Also, the bill to amend the AMA, including the abolition of
the JFTC's Hearing Procedure for appealing against the JFTC's administrative
orders and the necessary revisions to develop procedures for hearings prior to
the issue of the JFTC's administrative orders, was put into force on 1 April
2015. In accordance with the amendment of the AMA above, the JFTC allows the
would-be addressees of the cease and desist order to read and copy evidence
that proves the fact found by the JFTC.
The JFTC has been taking rigorous legal actions against
violations of the AMA. The number of legal cases against such violations
amounted to 14 in 2014 and 8 in 2015.
Bid – Rigging
Carlets (excluding bid-rigging)
Unfair Trade Practices
The total amount of surcharge payment orders issued by the
JFTC was estimated at ¥41204.48 million in 2014 and ¥2286.02 million in 2015.
The JFTC has adopted a proactive policy of indicting
violations of the AMA and imposing criminal penalties on violators. In March
2014, the JFTC indicted one case. In February 2016, the JFTC indicted one case.
In order to strengthen the role of the JFTC as a guardian of
the market, the JFTC increased the number of their personnel to 840 in 2016 and
most of them were assigned to the investigation section.
Japan has promoted reforms in several service-related
Based on the "Japan Revitalization Strategy ", the
FSA conducted a fact-finding survey and interviews to ascertain how companies
that have voluntarily adopted IFRS overcame any challenges they faced during
their transition to IFRS, as well as the advantages brought about by their
shift to IFRS, and published "IFRS Adoption Report" on April 2015 to
serve as a useful reference for companies considering adopting IFRS.
As for the telecommunications sector, in keeping with the
spread of the smart phone and diversification of public wireless LAN, the
definition of a public wireless LAN access service was widened in order to
impose obligations on Telecommunications Carriers to explain conditions of
offering services when concluding a contract. The G7 ICT Ministers' Meeting in
Takamatsu, Kagawa, which was held on 29-30 April 2016, was the first time in
about 20 years for an ICT Ministers' Meeting to be held as a part of the
Summit. At the meeting, Japan led a vigorous discussion on such topics as
promoting economic growth and promoting and protecting the free flow of
information in a society where the Internet of Things (IoT), Artificial
Intelligence (AI), and other emerging ICTs are becoming widespread. As a
result, Japan and the other G7 ICT Ministers successfully adopted three outcome
documents, the Charter, the Joint Declaration and the G7 Opportunities for
Collaboration (annexed to the Joint Declaration), which summarized the
fundamental principles and action plans for achieving a "Digitally
Connected World" where all people and things are connected globally. The
G7, which shares fundamental values such as freedom and democracy, issued a
message of unity to the world.